New research progress on 56786-63-1 in 2021. Catalysts allow a reaction to proceed via a pathway that has a lower activation energy than the uncatalyzed reaction. In an article, author is Suarez, D, once mentioned the application of 56786-63-1, Recommanded Product: (2AR,2’R,4S,5’R,6aR,6bS,8aS,8bR,9S,11aS,12aS,12bS)-2a,4-dihydroxy-5′,6a,8a,9-tetramethylicosahydrospiro[naphtho[2′,1′:4,5]indeno[2,1-b]furan-10,2′-pyran]-2(11aH)-one, Name is (2AR,2’R,4S,5’R,6aR,6bS,8aS,8bR,9S,11aS,12aS,12bS)-2a,4-dihydroxy-5′,6a,8a,9-tetramethylicosahydrospiro[naphtho[2′,1′:4,5]indeno[2,1-b]furan-10,2′-pyran]-2(11aH)-one, molecular formula is C27H42O5, molecular weight is 446.6194, MDL number is MFCD00273330, category is dioxole. Now introduce a scientific discovery about this category.
A theoretical analysis on planar and puckered-ring conformations of cyclopentadiene, 2,3-dihydrofuran, and 1,3-dioxole is carried out to test the conclusion of Laane and co-workers (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12132) that the unexpected nonplanarity of 1,3-dioxole must be attributed to the anomeric effect. MP4/6-31G**/IMP2/6-31G** calculations and NBO analysis show that delocalization involving the oxygen lone pairs and the C-O antibonding orbital, commonly associated with the anomeric effect, plays a decisive role in explaining the above-mentioned experimental fact. A careful analysis of the dipole-dipole interaction energy indicates that, in the present case, the electrostatic theory does not help to rationalize the experimentally observed puckered-ring conformation of 1,3-dioxole.
If you are hungry for even more, make sure to check my other article about 56786-63-1, Recommanded Product: (2AR,2’R,4S,5’R,6aR,6bS,8aS,8bR,9S,11aS,12aS,12bS)-2a,4-dihydroxy-5′,6a,8a,9-tetramethylicosahydrospiro[naphtho[2′,1′:4,5]indeno[2,1-b]furan-10,2′-pyran]-2(11aH)-one.
Reference:
1,3-Benzodioxole – Wikipedia,
,Dioxole | C3H4O2 – PubChem